June 2001. High Court Judge Neuberger, despite the admission of the Petitioners Cripps Harries Hall’s admission that they had fraudulently applied for my bankruptcy, decided on his whim, in the name of Queen Elizabeth II, to aid, abet and assist fraud against my person.

July 2001. Vooght applied to court for an Eviction Order and with armed Sussex Police did unlawfully enter Summersales Farm placing all persons and children in fear of their lives. Sussex Police were fully aware that they acted upon a fraudulently obtained Eviction Order, yet threatened armed violence. Widespread theft was encountered, undertaken by the contractors Vooght had employed.

June 2002. High Court Judge Neuberger committed my person to prison upon the application of Vooght Trustee, knowing he acted upon fraud and therefore breached the Magna Carta.

September 2002. Vooght obtained a further fraudulent Eviction Order and again with the support of Sussex Police, entered Summersales Farm in trespass. Sussex Police officers oversaw the widespread looting of property by Winston Leachman with others and found him in possession of a large cannabis factory.

Sussex Police declined to prosecute Leachman for cannabis production as it has now come to light that Leachman was sharing the proceeds of his crime with Sussex Police officers.

2003-2005. Sussex Police decline to investigate crimes generally committed against our persons, and as such, pervert the course of justice. Sussex Police arrested myself for offences committed by Leachman namely, cultivating cannabis, when I went to recover my stolen property from him. This was in effect a cover up by Sussex Police.

2007. Sussex Police prosecuted my person for cannabis production knowing that Leachman was the grower and supplier of cannabis to 49 stations and 15 football clubs and paid the police. Sussex Police called Leachman to give perjured evidence against my person to gain my conviction.

2008. Stephen Bazzoni, Senior Investigator, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) contacted me stating that I had committed offences by my failure to disclose the fact that I was a bankrupt. I refuted this and presented all evidence to support the fact that I was subject to a fraudulent bankruptcy and refused to comply with it, despite still being un-discharged from it by way of Vooght’s PwC fraudulent application. After a full investigation of the evidence, BERR decided not to prosecute my person, acting in the full knowledge that to do so would expose the Petitioners, Trustee and BERR to charges of fraud.

This was in effect a cover up by BERR. An aBERRation of governance.