It gives rise and indication that Her Majesty treats Her Subjects with general contempt and merely uses them to maintain Her sumptuous standard of living at their expense, therefore the integrity of Her Majesty can be brought into serious doubt as Her Majesty openly aids, abets and assists crime against my person and children by solicitors Cripps Harries Hall, accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers and Her bankers, Coutts & Co.

It brings into question the integrity of The Queen’s investments managed by Her bankers, Coutts & Co. as all named parties have association with each other.

Does Her Majesty profit from fraud?

By way of my Statutory Right to the “Freedom of Expression” I am able to lawfully expose Her Majesty’s dirty washing in the “public domain”.

Judge Richard Brown.

Judge Richard Brown, as identified under the heading of “Rodney Warren” chose by his own volition to pervert the course of justice, acting in the full knowledge that I would have difficulty in retaining “honest solicitors” to act on my behalf, as solicitors by the past evidence in my case, decline to act in my best interests, or decline to act at all. Such is the power of the judiciary to keep their criminal conduct in aiding, abetting and assisting criminal conduct by their “Officers of the Court”, out of the public domain by the denial of my person to a fair trial. Or, preventing my person access to the courts by way of making my person subject to Grepe-v-Loam Orders to prevent such access, as the court will never grant permission for me to pursue action against their officers again in the court, after I successfully succeeded against them in Hoath-v-Cripps Harries Hall, 10th November 1998.

It should also be noted that I have also been denied access to the European Court of Human Rights. This fact gives a clear indication as to the depth of corruption within the established judicial and governmental system supported by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II to conceal criminal conduct.

Mr. John Marsden-Lynch.

In the first instance, Mr. Marsden-Lynch was supportive of my case and defence, but latterly adopted a similar stance as Mr. Scot Halkyard. I was not aware at the time that Mr. Marsden-Lynch relies upon the major part of his income from receiving briefs from the Crown Prosecution Service on behalf of Sussex Police.

Mr. Marsden-Lynch chose not to challenge the fact that Judge Brown, by his own volition, had sought to pervert the course of justice to effectively destroy my defence.

( continued overleaf [3] )