An introduction to the matter of Corruption In The Crown. J M E Hoath.

 
contents p1 corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption corruption commentary
Synopsis
Chronology
Judgments
Communications
Statements
Magna Carta Image
 

Duress by Stephen Leinster of The Insolvency Service.

Mr. Stephen Leinster, Director of Public Policy at the Insolvency Service, admits that he is responsible for the regulation of insolvency practitioners, yet as proved, has no adequate machinery in place to regulate insolvency practitioners.

This fact is gross negligence or recklessness on the part of Mr. Leinster, or in the alternative, Mr. Leinster, knowing of the “vast profits to be made from insolvency by the practitioners”, receives “incentives” not to have suitable machinery available for the purpose and adopts an arrogant approach when questioned on this fact and generally acts in a clandestine manner as to the provision of information regarding the conduct of insolvency practitioners, having full knowledge of the fact that PricewaterhouseCoopers were acting in “Breach of Trust”.

Mr. Leinster has and is using the “distress, trauma with threats of, and past violence by the Petitioners and Trustee in Bankruptcy”, to force my person to adhere to, and accept, the fraud against my person and family, in line with the submission to, “by the Petitioners and Trustee in Bankruptcy” and the acceptance of the fact, by High Court Judge Neuberger, that I should “accept” fraud, assault, battery and robbery by the Petitioner and Trustee and “take it on the chin”.

The Judgement of High Court Judge Neuberger, on behalf of Queen Elizabeth II is “fraudulent”, therefore in breach of my “Constitutional and Statutory Rights”, which by past evidence, is acceptable to “The Queen”, and as such, “willingly” accepts the abuse by “Her Officers”, against a “British Subject”.


Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Criminal Investigation.

It remains to be seen as to how the Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform act against the listed parties as Regulators, given the fact that overwhelming evidence exists to prosecute all those concerned! Will the BERR find that it is “not in the Public Interest” to prosecute solicitors, accountants, Sussex Police and members of the Insolvency Service and Judiciary? STOP PRESS

This case highlights the fact that the British Citizen is used merely as a “pawn” to satisfy the greed of the Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Sussex Police. “The Establishment”.

01/12/2008

 
     
 

 

 
     
  Terms of use © Copyright J Hoath   continue   Contact (via solicitor) Film/book rights