...letter of 29 March 1994, in my judgment, indicate that the defendants did not take that assertion seriously.

Mr Christopher Hall, it seems, asked his son, Colin Hall, to attend at 10 am on 30 March, and told him that it would be lawful to remove the sign from the place in which it was fixed and take it away. Mr Christopher Hall justified these assertions by telling his son that Mr Hoath had relinquished title to the sign and disowned the land. This was the evidence of Colin Hall. I have not found this part of Colin Hall’s evidence easy to understand or accept, but I do accept that he felt justified in his actions in reliance upon his father’s assurances. Colin Hall was at this time 23 years of age, and training to become a solicitor. Perhaps he was not inclined to doubt his father, albeit that his legal training should have raised questions in his mind; he should have had doubts about the legitimacy of the actions that he was being invited to take.

Colin Hall obtained the assistance of Colin Russell, who was an employed farm worker on Mr Christopher Hall’s farm. Christopher Hall and Mr Voss (another partner of the defendant firm) attended the scene in a Renault. Colin Hall and Colin Russell went to the plaintiff’s farm in a van and they arrived at or about 10 am on 30 March.

The plaintiff was, of course, waiting for them. He had summoned a local reporter, Mr Higgett, by telephone that morning, having received the letter dated 29 March. Present also was a solicitor, Mr Parker, and Mrs Hoath, neither of whom gave evidence before me. The plaintiff says that he...

WARNING!

Sussex Police have effectively left other innocent people of Sussex to be the subject to further criminality and fraud. Such is the integrity of Sussex Police.

The action against Cripps Harries Hall was brought on my behalf by Moss Beachley & Mullem, 37, Crawford Street, London. Moss Beachley & Mullem have subsequently declined to act further on my behalf as it would seem, have been “warned off by the judiciary” from acting any further on my behalf. “MASONIC INFLUENCE!”

Masonic influence in all maters relating to my person, family and tenants is the logical conclusion that the “reasonable man” would be obliged to arrive at as the extremities of the law have long been surpassed.

( continued overleaf [8] )